#ODNI #FBI #EU

#ODNI  #FBI  #EU
x.com/mikenov/status/2092539…Michael Novakhov (@mikenov)” #EU Just Did The UNTHINKABLE With  #Putin‘s $300B…  #Russia Is POWERLESS – AI Mode
EU Just Did The UNTHINKABLE With Putin’s $300B… Russia Is POWERLESS
Review of YT post:
The phrase “EU Just Did The UNTHINKABLE With Putin’s $300B… Russia Is POWERLESS” is the title of a sensationalized online commentary video regarding the European Union’s ongoing, real-world mechanism to redirect windfall profits generated from frozen Russian central bank assets to fund Ukraine’s military defense. [1, 2, 3, 4]
The actual policy development involves using the interest earned from approximately €200 billion to €300 billion in immobilized Russian sovereign reserves—the majority of which are held at the Euroclear clearinghouse in Brussels—rather than a direct, outright confiscation of the underlying principal capital. [5, 6, 7]
Key Developments in the Asset Profits Strategy

Recent Funding Approvals: European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen authorized a €1.4 billion tranche derived from these frozen asset profits to purchase urgent military supplies and missile interceptors for Ukraine. Separately, the EU approved a broader €6.1 billion defense package. [1, 7, 8]
The Shift to Domestic Ukrainian Production: Rather than strictly shipping weapons from dwindling Western stockpiles, a significant portion of this money—including a dedicated $440 million (€400 million) allocation—is being directly invested into Ukraine’s own domestic defense industry. This allows Kyiv to manufacture its own long-range drones, artillery pieces, and missiles internally. [9, 10, 11]
The €90 Billion Macro-Loan Framework: To provide long-term predictability, the EU structured a massive €90 billion Ukraine Support Loan spanning 2026 and 2027. This loan is structured to be backed and repaid by the future stream of windfall profits generated by the frozen Russian assets. [7, 10, 12, 13]

Why the EU Uses Profits Instead of Seizing the Core $300 Billion
The headline’s claim that the EU did the “unthinkable” exaggerates the legally cautious approach European leaders have actually taken. While Ukraine has repeatedly pushed for a total confiscation of the €300 billion, the EU has strictly avoided seizing the primary capital due to several complex factors: [6, 14]

Eurozone Financial Stability: The European Central Bank (ECB) warned that outright seizure could damage international investor confidence in the Euro. Major non-Western economies, such as China, might withdraw their investments from European clearinghouses out of fear that their assets could also be targeted in future disputes. [5, 14]
Legal Protections: International law strongly protects state sovereign immunity. By only liquidating and redirecting the extraordinary interest and profits accumulated by institutions like Euroclear after the 2022 sanctions took effect, Brussels maintains that it is not violating international treaties. [6, 15]
Retaliation Safeguards: Western firms still hold tens of billions of dollars inside Russia. A full confiscation of Russia’s central bank funds would trigger immediate retaliatory nationalization of those remaining Western corporate assets by the Kremlin. [14]

[1]  politico.eu
[2]  youtube.com
[3]  youtube.com
[4]  youtube.com
[5]  voanews.com
[6]  youtube.com
[7]  instagram.com
[8]  rubryka.com
[9]  mod.gov.ua
[10]  facebook.com
[11]  facebook.com
[12]  bbc.com
[13]  threads.com
[14]  dw.com
[15]  politico.eu—  https://x.com/mikenov/status/2092539023529042172

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Aug 26, 2026