RT by @mikenov: RT by @mikenov: The U.S just put the future of warfare in the hands of Elon Musk. The Pentagon appointed the tech billionaire to co-lead ”Project Meridian,” which will map out the future of AI and autonomous military warfare in the country. Experts say the move is deeply problematic, as Musk has significant conflicts of interest. SpaceX holds a plethora of Pentagon contracts. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth officially launched “Project Meridian” during his State of the Force address, appointing SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, Anduril Industries founder Palmer Luckey, and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich to co-lead the 120-day task force. Under the oversight of Pentagon technology

The U.S just put the future of warfare in the hands of Elon Musk.

The Pentagon appointed the tech billionaire to co-lead ”Project Meridian,” which will map out the future of AI and autonomous military warfare in the country.

Experts say the move is deeply problematic, as Musk has significant conflicts of interest. SpaceX holds a plethora of Pentagon contracts.

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth officially launched “Project Meridian” during his State of the Force address, appointing SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, Anduril Industries founder Palmer Luckey, and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich to co-lead the 120-day task force.

Under the oversight of Pentagon technology chief Emil Michael, the group is tasked with determining how emerging technologies—including artificial intelligence, autonomy, directed energy, robotics, and biotechnology—will redefine global conflict. The initiative is designed to bypass traditional “creative limitations” to discover and field cutting-edge weapons systems that will shape U.S. combat readiness decades from now, culminating in a public report and a classified annex.

However, the high-profile appointments have immediately ignited intense scrutiny regarding potential conflicts of interest.

Both Musk and Luckey command private tech empires that hold multibillion-dollar active contracts with the federal government, raising ethical questions about defense contractors influencing the Pentagon’s future spending priorities.

Critics argue that placing major political donors and tech monopolists at the helm of military AI research blurs the line between public interest and corporate profit, reinforcing the influence of the modern military-industrial complex.

source: Roston, A. (2026). Hegseth puts the future of warfare in the hands of major Maga donors. The Guardian.

— @SmartScience Oct 3, 2026