Why the Pentagon Is Going All In on Laser Weapons | US Iran War | FP Explains – YouTube youtube.com/watch?v=sFPOyPKe…
— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Aug 8, 2026
Author: wawiimuy
🇷🇺🇺🇦 Zelensky on the pain Ukraine is feeling in the latest round of escalation with Russia:
“Russian strikes are mostly directed against facilities that serve the everyday lives of our people.
We effectively have no undamaged power plants left.
Many railway stations have been damaged; hospitals, universities, and ordinary civilian businesses have been destroyed.”
Ukraine, meanwhile, has struck over 200 Russian tankers in and near the Black Sea in the last month, severely restricting Russian oil exports.
Writer: Mhedi
x.com/clashreport/status/208…
Video
— @MarioNawfal Aug 8, 2026
#CIA #DIA #Mossad
The issue (and the problem) is the strategy: Expensive Interceptors (4 M per Patriot) vs cheap drones ($20-$50,000 each).
x.com/mikenov/status/2086060…Michael Novakhov (@mikenov)GLOBAL #SECURITY AND #INTELLIGENCE #NEWS REVIEW
Iran war: comparison of losses
US-Israel Iran Air War Losses share.gemini.google/TpySBSm4…
The US-Israel war on Iran: comparison of losses in air attack and air defense ammunition on both sides – AI Mode
share.google/aimode/tA4heQCj…
Operation Epic Fury (February 2026)
The following comparison details the ammunition losses (expended ordnance) and associated costs during the “US-Israel war on Iran” (often referred to as Operation Epic Fury), which began on February 28, 2026. [1, 2, 3]
Quick Summary: The Asymmetry of Cost
The conflict is defined by a massive financial disparity. The US and Israel have expended billions of dollars in high-tech precision munitions and interceptors to counter Iranian attacks that cost only millions. [4, 5]US/Israel Expenditure: ~$5.6 billion in ammunition in just the first two days.
Iran Expenditure: ~$70 million for the ~2,000 drones launched in the opening waves.
Ratio: The US and Israel are spending approximately $9–10 on defense for every $1 of damage prevented or threat neutralized. [6, 7]1. US & Israeli Ammunition Losses (Expended)
The US and Israel have severely depleted their stockpiles of advanced weaponry, with officials warning it could take years to replenish inventories. [8, 9, 10, 11]
Air Defense (Interceptors)Patriot Missiles: The coalition reportedly fired 1,200 Patriot interceptors in the first 48 hours alone. With each missile costing ~$4 million, this single defensive effort cost roughly $4.8 billion. [5, 7]
Stockpile Impact: The US has burned through nearly half of its global inventory of Patriot and THAAD interceptors. [8, 9]
Other Systems: Israel has heavily utilized Arrow 3 interceptors (costing millions each) to counter ballistic missiles, while Gulf allies have also expended hundreds of Patriot missiles against cheap drones. [5]Air Attack (Offensive Munitions)
Cruise Missiles: The US launched over 1,000 Tomahawk cruise missiles in the opening phase, using nearly 50% of its global stock.
Precision Strike: The US Army has used “virtually all” of its ATACMS and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM) inventory.
Aerial Bombs: The Israeli Air Force (IAF) dropped over 6,000 munitions in the first 24 hours and approximately 18,000 bombs total over 10,800 strikes.
Total Cost: The estimated cost for offensive strike munitions in the first six days was $5.5 billion. [8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]2. Iranian Ammunition Losses (Expended & Destroyed)
Iran’s strategy relies on volume rather than precision, using mass-produced, low-cost systems to exhaust coalition defenses.Air Attack (Offensive Munitions)
Drones: Iran launched approximately 2,500 drones and missiles in the first four days.Cost: A Shahed suicide drone costs roughly $20,000–$50,000.
Total Expenditure: The ~2,000 drones used in the initial waves cost Iran only about $70 million. [6, 16, 17, 18]Ballistic Missiles: Iran fired roughly 650 ballistic missiles at Israel. Many of these carried cluster warheads aimed at population centers. [15]
Launch Volume: At its peak, Iran’s attack rate involved hundreds of projectiles per day, though this dropped by 90% after the first week due to coalition strikes on launchers. [19, 20]
Air Defense (Systems)
Expenditure: Specific data on the number of surface-to-air missiles fired by Iran is limited.
Destruction: The primary loss for Iran was the destruction of the systems themselves.80% of Iran’s air defense batteries were destroyed by Israeli and US strikes.
200 air defense targets and 300 missile launchers were eliminated in the first few days. [3, 14, 21]3. Strategic Implications of Ammunition Loss
FeatureUS & IsraelIranCost per ShotHigh ($2M–$4M per interceptor/missile)Low ($20k–$50k per drone)ReplenishmentSlow (Years to replace Patriots/Tomahawks)Fast (Months to produce cheap drones)Inventory StatusCritical (Long-range precision fires exhausted)Degraded (Launchers destroyed, but ammo cheap)
Verification Note: The data above reflects the “2026 Iran War” scenario (Operation Epic Fury) as described in the provided search results. Figures for the preceding “Twelve-Day War” in 2025 are significantly lower. [6, 22]
[1] wabe.org
[2] americanprogress.org
[3] youtube.com
[4] youtube.com[5] bruegel.org
[6] vifindia.org
[7] facebook.com
[8] youtube.com
[9] cfr.org
[10] washingtonpost.com
[11] abc.net.au
[12] reuters.com
[13] youtube.com
[14] youtube.com
[15] youtube.com
[16] theguardian.com
[17] facebook.com
[18] orfme.org
[19] understandingwar.org
[20] csis.org[21] timesofisrael.com
[22] en.wikipedia.org
-— https://x.com/mikenov/status/2086060129867190496— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Aug 8, 2026
GLOBAL #SECURITY AND #INTELLIGENCE #NEWS REVIEW
Iran war: comparison of losses
US-Israel Iran Air War Losses share.gemini.google/TpySBSm4…
The US-Israel war on Iran: comparison of losses in air attack and air defense ammunition on both sidesThe recent military confrontations between the US-Israel coalition and Iran, most notably peaking during the “Twelve-Day War” in June 2025 and continuing into 2026, resulted in massive expenditures of air defense interceptors and the widespread destruction of air attack infrastructure.
The conflict highlighted a stark asymmetry: Iran relied on high volumes of cheaper offensive munitions, while the US and Israel relied on highly advanced, expensive interceptors.
Ammunition and Infrastructure Losses
Here is a comparison of the verified losses and expenditures regarding air attack and air defense capabilities on both sides:
CapabilityUS & IsraelIranAir Defense Systems12+ US radar/satellite systems destroyed, including Patriot systems, a THAAD radar, and various early-warning radars.Nearly all Russian-supplied S-300 systems destroyed; over 120 surface-to-air missile launchers eliminated.Air Defense Munitions$1.48–$1.58 billion spent on interceptors. The US depleted roughly 14% of its entire THAAD stockpile, which will take 3 to 8 years to replenish.N/A (Relied primarily on surviving ground-based systems before they were neutralized).Air Attack MunitionsA US Special Forces ammunition depot at Jordan’s King Faisal Air Base was completely destroyed by Iranian strikes in July 2026.Expended 550+ ballistic missiles and 1,000+ drones in initial retaliations. Strikes cost Iran an estimated $1.1–$6.6 billion.Launch InfrastructureMinimal launcher losses, though some aircraft were lost.190 to 200+ ballistic missile launchers destroyed. Entire missile factories and their supply chains were eliminated, setting production back by years.
Strategic Impact and the Interceptor Burn Rate
While the US and Israel achieved air supremacy and heavily degraded Iran’s military-industrial complex, the conflict exposed critical vulnerabilities in modern air defense economics.
The Defender’s Burden:
The US and Israel successfully intercepted around 90% of incoming threats, saving an estimated $15 billion in property damage. However, the cost of doing so was immense. Because Iran often utilized lighter warheads and cluster munitions, or $10,000 drones against million-dollar interceptors, the US and Israel burned through critical stockpiles. The heavy reliance on the U.S. THAAD system—due to Israel’s insufficient Arrow interceptor capacity at times—significantly depleted American reserves.
Key insight: While it cost Iran between $1.1 and $6.6 billion to launch its missile strikes, the economic burden relative to its GDP per capita was up to 371 times greater than that of the United States.
The Attacker’s Attrition:
Iran’s ability to maintain a sustained barrage was ultimately crippled not by running out of missiles, but by losing the infrastructure required to launch and build them. The Israeli and US strikes specifically targeted missile factories and their underlying supply chains. While Iran retained a stockpile of several hundred to 1,000 missiles, their ability to easily replenish them or field coordinated barrages was effectively neutralized for the foreseeable future.
–AI Mode
share.google/aimode/tA4heQCj…
Operation Epic Fury (February 2026)
The following comparison details the ammunition losses (expended ordnance) and associated costs during the “US-Israel war on Iran” (often referred to as Operation Epic Fury), which began on February 28, 2026. [1, 2, 3]
Quick Summary: The Asymmetry of Cost
The conflict is defined by a massive financial disparity. The US and Israel have expended billions of dollars in high-tech precision munitions and interceptors to counter Iranian attacks that cost only millions. [4, 5]US/Israel Expenditure: ~$5.6 billion in ammunition in just the first two days.
Iran Expenditure: ~$70 million for the ~2,000 drones launched in the opening waves.
Ratio: The US and Israel are spending approximately $9–10 on defense for every $1 of damage prevented or threat neutralized. [6, 7]1. US & Israeli Ammunition Losses (Expended)
The US and Israel have severely depleted their stockpiles of advanced weaponry, with officials warning it could take years to replenish inventories. [8, 9, 10, 11]
Air Defense (Interceptors)Patriot Missiles: The coalition reportedly fired 1,200 Patriot interceptors in the first 48 hours alone. With each missile costing ~$4 million, this single defensive effort cost roughly $4.8 billion. [5, 7]
Stockpile Impact: The US has burned through nearly half of its global inventory of Patriot and THAAD interceptors. [8, 9]
Other Systems: Israel has heavily utilized Arrow 3 interceptors (costing millions each) to counter ballistic missiles, while Gulf allies have also expended hundreds of Patriot missiles against cheap drones. [5]Air Attack (Offensive Munitions)
Cruise Missiles: The US launched over 1,000 Tomahawk cruise missiles in the opening phase, using nearly 50% of its global stock.
Precision Strike: The US Army has used “virtually all” of its ATACMS and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM) inventory.
Aerial Bombs: The Israeli Air Force (IAF) dropped over 6,000 munitions in the first 24 hours and approximately 18,000 bombs total over 10,800 strikes.
Total Cost: The estimated cost for offensive strike munitions in the first six days was $5.5 billion. [8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]2. Iranian Ammunition Losses (Expended & Destroyed)
Iran’s strategy relies on volume rather than precision, using mass-produced, low-cost systems to exhaust coalition defenses.Air Attack (Offensive Munitions)
Drones: Iran launched approximately 2,500 drones and missiles in the first four days.Cost: A Shahed suicide drone costs roughly $20,000–$50,000.
Total Expenditure: The ~2,000 drones used in the initial waves cost Iran only about $70 million. [6, 16, 17, 18]Ballistic Missiles: Iran fired roughly 650 ballistic missiles at Israel. Many of these carried cluster warheads aimed at population centers. [15]
Launch Volume: At its peak, Iran’s attack rate involved hundreds of projectiles per day, though this dropped by 90% after the first week due to coalition strikes on launchers. [19, 20]
Air Defense (Systems)
Expenditure: Specific data on the number of surface-to-air missiles fired by Iran is limited.
Destruction: The primary loss for Iran was the destruction of the systems themselves.80% of Iran’s air defense batteries were destroyed by Israeli and US strikes.
200 air defense targets and 300 missile launchers were eliminated in the first few days. [3, 14, 21]3. Strategic Implications of Ammunition Loss
FeatureUS & IsraelIranCost per ShotHigh ($2M–$4M per interceptor/missile)Low ($20k–$50k per drone)ReplenishmentSlow (Years to replace Patriots/Tomahawks)Fast (Months to produce cheap drones)Inventory StatusCritical (Long-range precision fires exhausted)Degraded (Launchers destroyed, but ammo cheap)
Verification Note: The data above reflects the “2026 Iran War” scenario (Operation Epic Fury) as described in the provided search results. Figures for the preceding “Twelve-Day War” in 2025 are significantly lower. [6, 22]
[1] wabe.org
[2] americanprogress.org
[3] youtube.com
[4] youtube.com[5] bruegel.org
[6] vifindia.org
[7] facebook.com
[8] youtube.com
[9] cfr.org
[10] washingtonpost.com
[11] abc.net.au
[12] reuters.com
[13] youtube.com
[14] youtube.com
[15] youtube.com
[16] theguardian.com
[17] facebook.com
[18] orfme.org
[19] understandingwar.org
[20] csis.org[21] timesofisrael.com
[22] en.wikipedia.org
–— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Aug 8, 2026
#CIA #DIA #Mossad
The issue (and the problem) is the strategy: Expensive Interceptors (4 M per Patriot) vs cheap drones ($20-50,000).
x.com/mikenov/status/2086060…Michael Novakhov (@mikenov)GLOBAL #SECURITY AND #INTELLIGENCE #NEWS REVIEW
Iran war: comparison of losses
US-Israel Iran Air War Losses share.gemini.google/TpySBSm4…
The US-Israel war on Iran: comparison of losses in air attack and air defense ammunition on both sides – AI Mode
share.google/aimode/tA4heQCj…
Operation Epic Fury (February 2026)
The following comparison details the ammunition losses (expended ordnance) and associated costs during the “US-Israel war on Iran” (often referred to as Operation Epic Fury), which began on February 28, 2026. [1, 2, 3]
Quick Summary: The Asymmetry of Cost
The conflict is defined by a massive financial disparity. The US and Israel have expended billions of dollars in high-tech precision munitions and interceptors to counter Iranian attacks that cost only millions. [4, 5]US/Israel Expenditure: ~$5.6 billion in ammunition in just the first two days.
Iran Expenditure: ~$70 million for the ~2,000 drones launched in the opening waves.
Ratio: The US and Israel are spending approximately $9–10 on defense for every $1 of damage prevented or threat neutralized. [6, 7]1. US & Israeli Ammunition Losses (Expended)
The US and Israel have severely depleted their stockpiles of advanced weaponry, with officials warning it could take years to replenish inventories. [8, 9, 10, 11]
Air Defense (Interceptors)Patriot Missiles: The coalition reportedly fired 1,200 Patriot interceptors in the first 48 hours alone. With each missile costing ~$4 million, this single defensive effort cost roughly $4.8 billion. [5, 7]
Stockpile Impact: The US has burned through nearly half of its global inventory of Patriot and THAAD interceptors. [8, 9]
Other Systems: Israel has heavily utilized Arrow 3 interceptors (costing millions each) to counter ballistic missiles, while Gulf allies have also expended hundreds of Patriot missiles against cheap drones. [5]Air Attack (Offensive Munitions)
Cruise Missiles: The US launched over 1,000 Tomahawk cruise missiles in the opening phase, using nearly 50% of its global stock.
Precision Strike: The US Army has used “virtually all” of its ATACMS and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM) inventory.
Aerial Bombs: The Israeli Air Force (IAF) dropped over 6,000 munitions in the first 24 hours and approximately 18,000 bombs total over 10,800 strikes.
Total Cost: The estimated cost for offensive strike munitions in the first six days was $5.5 billion. [8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]2. Iranian Ammunition Losses (Expended & Destroyed)
Iran’s strategy relies on volume rather than precision, using mass-produced, low-cost systems to exhaust coalition defenses.Air Attack (Offensive Munitions)
Drones: Iran launched approximately 2,500 drones and missiles in the first four days.Cost: A Shahed suicide drone costs roughly $20,000–$50,000.
Total Expenditure: The ~2,000 drones used in the initial waves cost Iran only about $70 million. [6, 16, 17, 18]Ballistic Missiles: Iran fired roughly 650 ballistic missiles at Israel. Many of these carried cluster warheads aimed at population centers. [15]
Launch Volume: At its peak, Iran’s attack rate involved hundreds of projectiles per day, though this dropped by 90% after the first week due to coalition strikes on launchers. [19, 20]
Air Defense (Systems)
Expenditure: Specific data on the number of surface-to-air missiles fired by Iran is limited.
Destruction: The primary loss for Iran was the destruction of the systems themselves.80% of Iran’s air defense batteries were destroyed by Israeli and US strikes.
200 air defense targets and 300 missile launchers were eliminated in the first few days. [3, 14, 21]3. Strategic Implications of Ammunition Loss
FeatureUS & IsraelIranCost per ShotHigh ($2M–$4M per interceptor/missile)Low ($20k–$50k per drone)ReplenishmentSlow (Years to replace Patriots/Tomahawks)Fast (Months to produce cheap drones)Inventory StatusCritical (Long-range precision fires exhausted)Degraded (Launchers destroyed, but ammo cheap)
Verification Note: The data above reflects the “2026 Iran War” scenario (Operation Epic Fury) as described in the provided search results. Figures for the preceding “Twelve-Day War” in 2025 are significantly lower. [6, 22]
[1] wabe.org
[2] americanprogress.org
[3] youtube.com
[4] youtube.com[5] bruegel.org
[6] vifindia.org
[7] facebook.com
[8] youtube.com
[9] cfr.org
[10] washingtonpost.com
[11] abc.net.au
[12] reuters.com
[13] youtube.com
[14] youtube.com
[15] youtube.com
[16] theguardian.com
[17] facebook.com
[18] orfme.org
[19] understandingwar.org
[20] csis.org[21] timesofisrael.com
[22] en.wikipedia.org
-— https://x.com/mikenov/status/2086060129867190496— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Aug 8, 2026
GLOBAL #SECURITY AND #INTELLIGENCE #NEWS REVIEW
Iran war: comparison of losses
US-Israel Iran Air War Losses share.gemini.google/TpySBSm4…
The US-Israel war on Iran: comparison of losses in air attack and air defense ammunition on both sides – AI Mode
share.google/aimode/tA4heQCj…
Operation Epic Fury (February 2026)
The following comparison details the ammunition losses (expended ordnance) and associated costs during the “US-Israel war on Iran” (often referred to as Operation Epic Fury), which began on February 28, 2026. [1, 2, 3]
Quick Summary: The Asymmetry of Cost
The conflict is defined by a massive financial disparity. The US and Israel have expended billions of dollars in high-tech precision munitions and interceptors to counter Iranian attacks that cost only millions. [4, 5]US/Israel Expenditure: ~$5.6 billion in ammunition in just the first two days.
Iran Expenditure: ~$70 million for the ~2,000 drones launched in the opening waves.
Ratio: The US and Israel are spending approximately $9–10 on defense for every $1 of damage prevented or threat neutralized. [6, 7]1. US & Israeli Ammunition Losses (Expended)
The US and Israel have severely depleted their stockpiles of advanced weaponry, with officials warning it could take years to replenish inventories. [8, 9, 10, 11]
Air Defense (Interceptors)Patriot Missiles: The coalition reportedly fired 1,200 Patriot interceptors in the first 48 hours alone. With each missile costing ~$4 million, this single defensive effort cost roughly $4.8 billion. [5, 7]
Stockpile Impact: The US has burned through nearly half of its global inventory of Patriot and THAAD interceptors. [8, 9]
Other Systems: Israel has heavily utilized Arrow 3 interceptors (costing millions each) to counter ballistic missiles, while Gulf allies have also expended hundreds of Patriot missiles against cheap drones. [5]Air Attack (Offensive Munitions)
Cruise Missiles: The US launched over 1,000 Tomahawk cruise missiles in the opening phase, using nearly 50% of its global stock.
Precision Strike: The US Army has used “virtually all” of its ATACMS and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM) inventory.
Aerial Bombs: The Israeli Air Force (IAF) dropped over 6,000 munitions in the first 24 hours and approximately 18,000 bombs total over 10,800 strikes.
Total Cost: The estimated cost for offensive strike munitions in the first six days was $5.5 billion. [8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]2. Iranian Ammunition Losses (Expended & Destroyed)
Iran’s strategy relies on volume rather than precision, using mass-produced, low-cost systems to exhaust coalition defenses.Air Attack (Offensive Munitions)
Drones: Iran launched approximately 2,500 drones and missiles in the first four days.Cost: A Shahed suicide drone costs roughly $20,000–$50,000.
Total Expenditure: The ~2,000 drones used in the initial waves cost Iran only about $70 million. [6, 16, 17, 18]Ballistic Missiles: Iran fired roughly 650 ballistic missiles at Israel. Many of these carried cluster warheads aimed at population centers. [15]
Launch Volume: At its peak, Iran’s attack rate involved hundreds of projectiles per day, though this dropped by 90% after the first week due to coalition strikes on launchers. [19, 20]
Air Defense (Systems)
Expenditure: Specific data on the number of surface-to-air missiles fired by Iran is limited.
Destruction: The primary loss for Iran was the destruction of the systems themselves.80% of Iran’s air defense batteries were destroyed by Israeli and US strikes.
200 air defense targets and 300 missile launchers were eliminated in the first few days. [3, 14, 21]3. Strategic Implications of Ammunition Loss
FeatureUS & IsraelIranCost per ShotHigh ($2M–$4M per interceptor/missile)Low ($20k–$50k per drone)ReplenishmentSlow (Years to replace Patriots/Tomahawks)Fast (Months to produce cheap drones)Inventory StatusCritical (Long-range precision fires exhausted)Degraded (Launchers destroyed, but ammo cheap)
Verification Note: The data above reflects the “2026 Iran War” scenario (Operation Epic Fury) as described in the provided search results. Figures for the preceding “Twelve-Day War” in 2025 are significantly lower. [6, 22]
[1] wabe.org
[2] americanprogress.org
[3] youtube.com
[4] youtube.com[5] bruegel.org
[6] vifindia.org
[7] facebook.com
[8] youtube.com
[9] cfr.org
[10] washingtonpost.com
[11] abc.net.au
[12] reuters.com
[13] youtube.com
[14] youtube.com
[15] youtube.com
[16] theguardian.com
[17] facebook.com
[18] orfme.org
[19] understandingwar.org
[20] csis.org[21] timesofisrael.com
[22] en.wikipedia.org
–— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Aug 8, 2026
US-Israel Iran Air War Losses – Google Gemini gemini.google.com/app/62eb6e…
— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Aug 8, 2026
Volodymyr Zelensky announced that Kyiv secured agreements for monthly US deliveries of Patriot missiles, though 2026 supply volumes remain insufficient.
He urged European partners – particularly Germany and Poland – to supply additional interceptors.
— @KyivPost Aug 8, 2026
🚨🇺🇸🕊️🇮🇷 America’s top military officer is reportedly looking for an exit from the Iran war, warning that further escalation could backfire on Washington. Gen. Dan Caine is said to believe that airpower alone will not be enough to defeat Iran, while Israel has pushed strongly for a broader campaign.
According to CNN, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine has been actively seeking an “off-ramp” from the conflict and ways to prevent the United States from being drawn into an even larger war.
“Caine is looking for an off-ramp,” one source told CNN.
Caine reportedly believes that every major escalation option available to Washington carries serious risks and could ultimately backfire, while an air campaign alone is unlikely to produce a decisive defeat of Iran.
Another source said Caine’s position is largely driven by his desire to protect the U.S. military from being pulled into a broader and potentially far more costly conflict.
At the same time, Israel has strongly advocated further escalation, according to the report.
President Donald Trump remains opposed to deploying American ground forces inside Iran and has signaled that he believes sustained airstrikes could force Tehran to accept a deal on U.S. terms.
However, CNN reports that Caine and other senior members of the Trump administration privately consider that outcome unlikely and have instead been developing alternative options that remain within the president’s parameters.
The reported divide highlights the strategic dilemma facing Washington: escalating further could dramatically increase the military and political costs of the war, while airpower alone may not be sufficient to force Tehran into accepting U.S. demands.
See the latest updates with us: @visionergeo
Video
— @visionergeo Aug 8, 2026
🚨 BREAKING :
🇷🇺 Putin: “We are giving Elon Musk 48 hours to explain why Starlink is interfering with our strategic operations. Do not test our patience.”
🚀 Elon Musk: “Bro, I can literally disable your country’s entire GPS system from my phone while sitting on the toilet.”
Absolute cold-blooded reply.
Video
Community note: The quoted statements by Putin and Musk are not found on official Kremlin channels or Musk’s X account, and no credible news outlets report them. en.kremlin.ru x.com/elonmusk— @AssangeDeepZone Aug 8, 2026