💬 President #Putin to President @drpezeshkian:
As I have said on many occasions, Russia stands in solidarity with the people of Iran.
✊ We admire your courage & resilience in defending your national interests.
— @mfa_russia Sep 1, 2026
Category: Articles and Tweets
Category Added in a WPeMatico Campaign
‘Israel’s air war skills in the Russo-Ukrainian war – Gemini’ is on #SoundCloud on.soundcloud.com/JYFWMlVUNE…
— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Sep 1, 2026
Israel’s air war skills in the Russo-Ukrainian war https://share.gemini.google/bEPkOlZ5hBEK While Israel is not a direct combatant in the Russo-Ukrainian war, its air warfare capabilities intersect with the conflict in two distinct ways: through the tactical involvement of Israeli veterans volunteering in Ukraine, and as a strategic benchmark used by military analysts to evaluate Russia’s aerial failures. ## Direct Involvement: Israeli Expertise on the Ground Several Israeli special forces veterans have volunteered their operational skills to assist Ukraine’s defense, particularly in intelligence gathering and drone warfare. * **Drone Innovation:** Israeli veterans have designed high-capacity batteries that significantly extend the flight time of Ukrainian reconnaissance drones, enabling deeper surveillance behind Russian lines.
* **Targeting Iranian Assets:** Leveraging fluency in Persian, Israeli operatives within Ukrainian marine intelligence have successfully identified and guided artillery strikes against Iranian military advisors and drone testing sites operating in occupied Ukrainian territory.
* **Tactical Reconnaissance:** Israeli volunteers have conducted covert reconnaissance on Russian airfields (such as the strikes near Chornobayivka), feeding real-time coordinates to Ukrainian missile units. This intelligence directly contributed to the destruction of dozens of Russian helicopters, which helped stall the Russian advance on Odesa. — ## The Strategic Contrast: Israel vs. Russia Military planners frequently contrast Russia’s failure to achieve air superiority over Ukraine over the past 3.5 years with Israel’s rapid success in gaining control of the skies during its recent conflicts, such as the June 2025 campaign against Iran. The fundamental difference lies in military doctrine and integration. Israel treats air superiority as a joint national campaign, whereas Russia relies on isolated, attrition-based air force operations. | Capability | Israel’s Approach | Russia’s Approach in Ukraine |
| — | — | — |
| **Operational Integration** | Seamlessly combines cyber operations, intelligence, and ground special forces to degrade air defenses before jets even arrive. | Largely siloed. The air force operates independently without adequate intelligence preparation of the battlespace. |
| **SEAD Focus** | Rigorous, continuous training heavily prioritizing the Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses (SEAD). | SEAD was never prioritized in pilot training. Russian jets act as “flying artillery,” launching glide bombs from safe airspace to avoid being shot down. |
| **Intelligence Edge** | Months of mapping enemy air defenses and embedding operatives to destroy radar and launchers at close range. | Attempted early decapitation strikes but lacked the precise intelligence mapping required to dismantle Ukraine’s integrated air defenses. |
* **Targeting Iranian Assets:** Leveraging fluency in Persian, Israeli operatives within Ukrainian marine intelligence have successfully identified and guided artillery strikes against Iranian military advisors and drone testing sites operating in occupied Ukrainian territory.
* **Tactical Reconnaissance:** Israeli volunteers have conducted covert reconnaissance on Russian airfields (such as the strikes near Chornobayivka), feeding real-time coordinates to Ukrainian missile units. This intelligence directly contributed to the destruction of dozens of Russian helicopters, which helped stall the Russian advance on Odesa. — ## The Strategic Contrast: Israel vs. Russia Military planners frequently contrast Russia’s failure to achieve air superiority over Ukraine over the past 3.5 years with Israel’s rapid success in gaining control of the skies during its recent conflicts, such as the June 2025 campaign against Iran. The fundamental difference lies in military doctrine and integration. Israel treats air superiority as a joint national campaign, whereas Russia relies on isolated, attrition-based air force operations. | Capability | Israel’s Approach | Russia’s Approach in Ukraine |
| — | — | — |
| **Operational Integration** | Seamlessly combines cyber operations, intelligence, and ground special forces to degrade air defenses before jets even arrive. | Largely siloed. The air force operates independently without adequate intelligence preparation of the battlespace. |
| **SEAD Focus** | Rigorous, continuous training heavily prioritizing the Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses (SEAD). | SEAD was never prioritized in pilot training. Russian jets act as “flying artillery,” launching glide bombs from safe airspace to avoid being shot down. |
| **Intelligence Edge** | Months of mapping enemy air defenses and embedding operatives to destroy radar and launchers at close range. | Attempted early decapitation strikes but lacked the precise intelligence mapping required to dismantle Ukraine’s integrated air defenses. |
Israel’s air war skills in the Russo-Ukrainian war share.gemini.google/bEPkOlZ5…
— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Sep 1, 2026
#Israel #Russia #Ukraine
Israel’s air war skills in the Russo-Ukrainian war
Google AI Report
Gemini:
x.com/mikenov/status/2094774…
AI Mode:
x.com/mikenov/status/2094758…Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) #CIA #DIA #Mossad
What is the role and place of the Israel’s air war skills in the Russo-Ukrainian war? – AI Mode
Israel’s air war skills operate as a strategic mirror, a tactical testbed, and an indirect combat contributor in the Russo-Ukrainian war.
While Israel has historically navigated a delicate diplomatic tightrope with Moscow and has resisted direct intervention with its own fighter fleets, its doctrinal superiority in air defense, drone warfare, and suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD) fundamentally shapes the skies over Ukraine. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
The intersection of Israeli air war skills and the Russo-Ukrainian theater manifests in four distinct areas:
1. The Proving Ground for Iranian System Countermeasures
The war in Ukraine and the conflicts involving Israel have effectively merged into a shared technological front against Iranian-designed aviation hardware. [4]Flipping the Cost Curve: Russia relies heavily on Iranian-designed Shahed loitering munitions. Both Ukraine and Israel have faced massive, cheap drone swarms. Ukraine has utilized its highly innovative, decentralized drone architecture—combining acoustic sensors, AI tools, and mobile intercept teams—to neutralize these threats affordably, a skill set Israel has closely analyzed and integrated alongside its own rapid development of portable lasers and radar. [4, 6]
Shared Intelligence: Israel has historically provided Ukraine with critical intelligence regarding Iranian drone modifications and tactical deployment methods, which Kyiv uses to adapt its air defense targeting algorithms. [7]2. Physical Technology and Early-Warning Transfers
Though Israel avoided sending lethal offensive air power, its premier defensive capabilities have directly protected Ukrainian infrastructure.Early-Warning Systems: Israel deployed customized versions of its Tzeva Adom (Red Color) localized early-warning technology to Kyiv. This hyper-targeted alert system mimics Israel’s Home Front Command architecture, calculating missile trajectories in real-time to alert specific neighborhoods rather than triggering city-wide panic. [2, 7]
Air Defense Batteries: Reports indicate that shifting geopolitical realities eventually thawed some transfer restrictions, leading to the deployment of Israeli-sourced Patriot air defense batteries to bolster Ukraine’s fragile, multi-layered defense shield. [8]3. The SEAD Contrast: Air Superiority vs. Air Denial
Military analysts use Israel’s highly refined Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses (SEAD) skills as the primary benchmark to critique Russia’s air failures. [5, 9]Doctrine Differences: Israel treats air superiority as a joint, national strategic imperative. In its long-range campaigns, Israeli electronic warfare and cyber units thoroughly dismantled and blind-spotted enemy air architectures. [5, 9]
Russia’s Failure: In contrast, Russia treated its air force (VKS) as a tactical ground-support tool. Russia failed to execute an Israeli-style synchronized SEAD campaign in 2022, leaving Ukraine’s mobile air defenses intact. This allowed Ukraine to achieve “air denial,” forcing Russian manned aircraft completely out of Ukrainian-controlled skies. [5, 10, 11]4. System Vulnerability Mapping (The S-300 Legacy)
Israel’s decades-long specialization in neutralizing Soviet and Russian-engineered air defense systems has provided a massive data windfall for Western-backed Ukrainian planners. [1]Israeli air operations in the Middle East have repeatedly exposed the operational limitations, blind spots, and electronic vulnerabilities of Russian-made platforms like the S-300 and Pantsir systems. [1, 10]
The tactics pioneered by the Israeli Air Force (IAF) to bait, jam, and destroy these specific radar networks have directly informed the deployment of Western-supplied anti-radiation missiles (like the AGM-88 HARM) by the Ukrainian Air Force.Would you like to examine how the global shortage of Patriot interceptor missiles is currently impacting both the Israeli and Ukrainian air defense strategies, or are you more interested in a technical breakdown of how Ukrainian and Israeli drone-jamming tactics differ? [3, 4, 12]
[1] hoover.org
[2] mwi.westpoint.edu
[3] youtube.com
[4] nationalinterest.org
[5] ecfr.eu
[6] theconversation.com
[7] fdd.org
[8] thearabweekly.com
[9] csis.org
[10] wsj.com
[11] iwm.org.uk
[12] nytimes.com
–csis.org/analysis/air-superi…— https://x.com/mikenov/status/2094758762984649003
— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Sep 1, 2026
Israel’s air war skills in the Russo-Ukrainian war share.gemini.google/Kb05uqRE…
— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Sep 1, 2026
‘Conversations with the Gemini – AI Reports – August 2026’ is on #SoundCloud on.soundcloud.com/WT4YYCn1Nl…
— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Sep 1, 2026
‘Conversations – September 2026’ by Mike Nova 2 is on #SoundCloud on.soundcloud.com/l2HWTpsw6Z…
— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Sep 1, 2026
‘Israel’s air war skills in the Russo-Ukrainian war’ by Mike Nova 2 is on #SoundCloud on.soundcloud.com/hyhS1qVJDu…
— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Sep 1, 2026
What is the role and place of the Israel’s air war skills in the Russo-Ukrainian war? – AI Mode [Israel](https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=/m/03spz)’s air war skills hold a dual place in the [Russo-Ukrainian war](https://www.google.com/search?q=Russo-Ukrainian+war&kgmid=/m/0_x6d5x): serving as a strategic benchmark for achieving absolute air superiority and providing practical blueprints for integrated drone defense. [1, 2] While Israel is not a direct combatant, its air power doctrine, operational experiences against Iranian-designed systems, and technological innovations have significantly influenced both the tactical adaptations and strategic lessons of the conflict in Ukraine. [2, 3, 4] ## 1. The Strategic Benchmark for Air Superiority
The contrasting air campaigns of Israel and Russia have become a central study for military analysts. * Integrated National Campaigns: Israel views air superiority as a national strategic objective. In operations like Rising Lion, Israel successfully combined air assets, cyber warfare, special forces, and electronic jamming to completely dismantle enemy air defense networks. [1, 3] * The Failure of Russian Air Doctrine: In contrast, Russia treated air power as a mere tactical enabler in 2022. Because Russia failed to coordinate electronic warfare and suppression strategies effectively, Ukraine established an enduring “air denial” environment. This forced Russia to abandon deep manned-aircraft operations and rely on standoff strikes. Israel’s ability to swiftly take control of contested airspace highlights the structural gaps in Russia’s air doctrine. [3, 4, 5] ## 2. Countering the Iranian “Shahed” Ecosystem
Russia’s heavy reliance on Iranian-designed Shahed loitering munitions directly ties Israel’s battlefield experiences to Ukraine. [2] * Flipping the Cost Curve: Both nations face the dilemma of firing million-dollar air defense missiles at cheap, mass-produced drones. Ukraine has closely analyzed how Israel blunts mass drone swarms using a layered defense matrix. [2, 6] * Tactical Synergy: While Israel has pioneered rapid deployment of portable lasers and new radar to counter cheap projectiles, Ukraine has masterfully built an integrated architecture using acoustic sensors, AI-driven tracking, and physical netting. Analysts note that combining Israel’s cutting-edge intercept technologies with Ukraine’s battle-tested drone innovation creates the definitive modern template for counter-UAV warfare. [2]
The contrasting air campaigns of Israel and Russia have become a central study for military analysts. * Integrated National Campaigns: Israel views air superiority as a national strategic objective. In operations like Rising Lion, Israel successfully combined air assets, cyber warfare, special forces, and electronic jamming to completely dismantle enemy air defense networks. [1, 3] * The Failure of Russian Air Doctrine: In contrast, Russia treated air power as a mere tactical enabler in 2022. Because Russia failed to coordinate electronic warfare and suppression strategies effectively, Ukraine established an enduring “air denial” environment. This forced Russia to abandon deep manned-aircraft operations and rely on standoff strikes. Israel’s ability to swiftly take control of contested airspace highlights the structural gaps in Russia’s air doctrine. [3, 4, 5] ## 2. Countering the Iranian “Shahed” Ecosystem
Russia’s heavy reliance on Iranian-designed Shahed loitering munitions directly ties Israel’s battlefield experiences to Ukraine. [2] * Flipping the Cost Curve: Both nations face the dilemma of firing million-dollar air defense missiles at cheap, mass-produced drones. Ukraine has closely analyzed how Israel blunts mass drone swarms using a layered defense matrix. [2, 6] * Tactical Synergy: While Israel has pioneered rapid deployment of portable lasers and new radar to counter cheap projectiles, Ukraine has masterfully built an integrated architecture using acoustic sensors, AI-driven tracking, and physical netting. Analysts note that combining Israel’s cutting-edge intercept technologies with Ukraine’s battle-tested drone innovation creates the definitive modern template for counter-UAV warfare. [2]