🚨🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia has beheaded 2 Bangladesh citizens for “immoral conduct”.
Their headless bodies were sent to Bangladesh without notifying the government or authorities, prompting a diplomatic crisis.
The 2 individuals were executed with a sword strike to their necks.
— @EthanLevins2 Oct 19, 2026
In 2010 a homosexual Saudi prince strangled to death his Ethiopian sex slave in a 5star London hotel.
He was sentenced to life in prison for the sadistic murder but the British government released him early so he could return to Saudi Arabia & enjoy the rest of his life there.BBC News (World) (@BBCWorld)Bangladesh says it was not informed of its citizens’ execution by Saudi Arabia bbc.in/4zJmny7— https://x.com/BBCWorld/status/2112096539317277050
— @Contrarianism1 Oct 19, 2026
Russia has reportedly planned to launch ground operations in Ukraine to seize control of key areas and force the country into submission very soon.
Moscow says it will deploy its full military force to compel Kyiv to surrender within a week.
Russia also says that if European countries won’t stop helping Kyiv against Moscow, they will be treated with iron hand.
— @World_Affairs11 Oct 19, 2026
#CIA CIA #FBI FBI #Mossad Mossad
The Mastermind
Selected Tweets thenewsandtimes.blogspot.com…— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Oct 19, 2026
Putin wants summit with Xi, Trump to be redux of Yalta, which divided up world after WWII: report trib.al/WZCMTUk
— @nypost Oct 19, 2026
🇫🇷🇷🇺 French intelligence agencies have confirmed that Russia-linked bot networks are weaponizing the past weekend’s violent riots by flooding social media with old, recycled, and AI-generated fake videos of police brutality to provoke the rioters even further.
Russian networks like “Matryoshka” are acting as digital opportunistic arsonists, intentionally exaggerating the scale of the chaos to simulate nationwide civil unrest.
— @visegrad24 Oct 19, 2026
Base Wainwright in Alberta – Google Search google.com/search?q=Base+Wai…
— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Oct 19, 2026
#Hanning #Patrushev #Germany
Hanning and Patrushev – Google Search google.com/search?q=Hanning+…
August Hanning: Former head of Germany’s foreign intelligence service (BND) from 1998 to 2005, later serving as State Secretary of the Ministry of the Interior. He was arrested and placed under investigation by Germany’s Federal Prosecutor’s Office in October 2026 on suspicion of espionage and high treason. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Nikolai Patrushev: Vladimir Putin’s longtime security confidant, former director of the FSB (1999–2008), and former Secretary of the Security Council of the Russian Federation (2008–2024). [1]
The Connection: Investigative reports (including disclosures from FAZ and leaked documents) revealed that Hanning maintained years of post-retirement contact and private meetings with Patrushev, spanning key geopolitical events:2014: Meeting shortly after Russia’s annexation of Crimea, framed by Hanning’s lawyer as an attempt to warn of negative consequences.
2016: Attendance at a Moscow security conference opened by Patrushev, where Hanning advocated for counter-terrorism cooperation with Russia and criticized sanctions.
2019: Participation in an Arctic Council-related event led by Patrushev, which included a visit to the Valaam Island monastery where Hanning was placed in a position of honor directly beside Patrushev in group photographs. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]Current Status: Hanning’s sustained, multi-year proximity and private communications with a top Kremlin security official are a central focus of German authorities investigating alleged intelligence leaks and ties to Russian influence operations, as detailed in coverage by Politico and Ground News. [1, 2, 3, 4]
— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Oct 19, 2026
US foreign policy under Putin’s whore in the White House.
— @JayinKyiv Oct 19, 2026
Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev spoke the infamous “We will bury you” phrase (“Мы вас похороним!”) on November 18, 1956, during a reception at the Polish embassy in Moscow while addressing Western ambassadors….
“Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you!”
NATO and Israeli envoys walked out of the reception in protest. Many in the United States and Western Europe interpreted the statement as a literal, aggressive nuclear or military threat. Khrushchev was not issuing a physical death threat or a promise of military destruction. Instead, he was referencing Marxist-Leninist ideology regarding the historical inevitability of capitalism’s collapse and communism’s triumph.
. . .
Four words from Nikita Khrushchev sounded like a threat to destroy the West. At a reception in Moscow on November 18, 1956, the Soviet Communist Party leader told Western diplomats that history was on the side of communism and declared, “We will bury you.” In the tense atmosphere of the Cold War, the phrase was widely understood as evidence of Soviet hostility and potential aggression. Yet Khrushchev’s original argument concerned the supposedly inevitable historical defeat of capitalism, not necessarily a literal promise to kill the people standing before him.
The declaration came during a particularly dangerous year in Soviet relations with the outside world. In February 1956, Khrushchev had privately denounced aspects of Stalin’s rule, unsettling the communist movement. In October and November, Soviet troops suppressed the Hungarian uprising, while Britain and France joined Israel in the Suez crisis. Western governments were deeply suspicious of Soviet intentions, and political speeches were being interpreted against the possibility of nuclear confrontation. Khrushchev was speaking at a reception honoring visiting Polish Communist leader Władysław Gomułka, whose emergence in Poland had itself followed a serious political crisis within the Soviet bloc.
The Soviet leader’s remarks were not confined to one memorable sentence. According to contemporary reporting, he told representatives of capitalist countries that Soviet existence did not depend on Western approval. They could refuse invitations or contacts, but communism would survive regardless. He then presented the historical claim that the communist system would prevail over capitalism. The declaration about burial followed that argument. It was confrontational and deliberately confident, but its immediate intellectual source was the Marxist-Leninist expectation that capitalism would eventually be replaced by a different economic and political order.
Western reactions nevertheless focused on the most alarming interpretation. During a decade marked by the Korean War, nuclear weapons development and confrontation between military alliances, language about burying an ideological opponent could easily be understood as a warning of physical destruction. The phrase circulated rapidly in newspapers and political speeches, becoming a symbol of Soviet aggression. It also fitted Khrushchev’s public reputation for forceful, unpredictable rhetoric. The ideological meaning did not make his words harmless: Soviet forces had just intervened violently in Hungary, demonstrating that Moscow was willing to use military power to defend its sphere of influence.
— @histories_arch Oct 19, 2026