RT by @mikenov: RT by @mikenov: ‼️🇺🇦🇺🇸👀 Elon Musk has reportedly told Mykhailo Fedorov that he does not personally oppose Ukraine using Starlink to support strikes against targets inside Russia, but made clear that such a decision ultimately belongs to the White House. According to the Financial Times, Musk told Fedorov that the technical issue was not the main obstacle and that authorization for such use would require a political decision from Washington. The revelation comes as Ukraine continues seeking greater freedom to strike the systems and launch infrastructure behind Russia’s long-range missile campaign. That leaves an increasingly uncomfortable contradiction in U.S. policy. Was

‼️🇺🇦🇺🇸👀 Elon Musk has reportedly told Mykhailo Fedorov that he does not personally oppose Ukraine using Starlink to support strikes against targets inside Russia, but made clear that such a decision ultimately belongs to the White House.

According to the Financial Times, Musk told Fedorov that the technical issue was not the main obstacle and that authorization for such use would require a political decision from Washington. The revelation comes as Ukraine continues seeking greater freedom to strike the systems and launch infrastructure behind Russia’s long-range missile campaign.

That leaves an increasingly uncomfortable contradiction in U.S. policy. Washington argues that depleted stocks limit the number of Patriot interceptors it can provide Ukraine, yet it also remains cautious about enabling Kyiv to destroy Russian ballistic-missile assets before they launch. If defensive interceptors are scarce, giving Ukraine greater ability to suppress the threat at its source would appear strategically logical. The unresolved question is whether escalation concerns are still outweighing battlefield necessity.

See the latest updates with us:  @visionergeo
Video
 

— @visionergeo Aug 31, 2026