Rich Pedroncelli/AP
hide caption
toggle caption
Ric
Rich Pedroncelli/AP
hide caption
toggle caption
Ric
|
Michael_Novakhov shared this story from |
FILE – Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., appears at a town hall meeting in Sacramento, Calif., April 7, 2026.
Rich Pedroncelli/AP
hide caption
toggle caption
Rich Pedroncelli/AP
WASHINGTON — Federal agents seized electronic devices from former Rep. Eric Swalwell and searched his Washington home as part of an investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct by the ex-Democratic congressman from California, according to a person familiar with the matter.
Swalwell’s devices were seized at the San Francisco airport on Saturday and agents executed a search warrant at his home a day later, said the person, who was not authorized to publicly discuss an ongoing investigation and spoke on the condition of anonymity.
A message seeking comment was left Thursday with an attorney for Swalwell, who has denied allegations of sexual assault and misconduct. The Daily Mail first reported the seizure of Swalwell’s devices on Thursday.
Swalwell announced his resignation from Congress in April following allegations that Swalwell had sexually assaulted a woman twice, including when she worked for him. The San Francisco Chronicle, followed by CNN, first reported the allegations. CNN also reported that three other women alleged various kinds of sexual misconduct by Swalwell, including sending them unsolicited explicit messages or nude photos.
The seven-term lawmaker had been seen as one of the leading candidates in California’s gubernatorial race before dropping out after the allegations surfaced.
The office of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg confirmed in April that it was investigating Swalwell after a former staffer told CNN and the Chronicle that Swalwell raped her at a hotel while he was in New York City for a charity gala in 2024. In a statement, Bragg’s office encouraged “survivors and anyone with knowledge of these allegations to contact our Special Victims Division.”
A lawyer representing Lonna Drewes, a California woman who in April said she had been raped in 2018 by Swalwell, said his team was cooperating with all law enforcement agencies investigating the former congressman.
“We are encouraged to learn about the escalation of the FBI’s investigation into the allegations against Eric Swalwell,” attorney Arick Fudali said in a statement.
Drewes spoke of the assault at a news conference days after Swalwell dropped out of the California governor’s race. She said it occurred at a hotel in Southern California. Swalwell denied that assault.
Swalwell, an Iowa native, was elected in 2012 and represented a House district east of San Francisco. He launched a presidential run in April 2019 but ended it a few months later after failing to catch on with voters.
He was one of Republican President Donald Trump’s top Democratic antagonists in Congress. He was a prominent member of the House Judiciary and Intelligence committees during Trump’s first term and served as one of several Democratic prosecutors for Trump’s second impeachment after the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.
Swalwell was removed from the Intelligence Committee by then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., in 2023 based on Swalwell’s contact with a suspected Chinese spy, Christine Fang.
Fang was reported to have come into contact with Swalwell’s campaign as he was first running for Congress in 2012 and to have participated in fundraising for his 2014 campaign.
Federal investigators alerted Swalwell to their concerns and briefed Congress about Fang in 2015, at which point Swalwell says he cut off contact with her. He was not accused of wrongdoing and a House Ethics Committee investigation that was opened in 2021 closed two years later without any action.
California lawmaker Aisha Wahab secured victory Thursday in a special election to serve the rest of Swalwell’s House term, which ends in January. She will run again in the November election to represent the district for a full two-year term.
|
Michael_Novakhov shared this story from |
Brady O’Rourke in Crystal, Minn., holds a sign he made to block the view of a Flock camera, which tracks vehicles driving along the road. It’s one of several actions Americans are taking to oppose this police surveillance technology.
Meg Anderson/NPR
hide caption
toggle caption
Meg Anderson/NPR
A few times a week, Brady O’Rourke walks to the busiest street near his house in Crystal, Minn., carrying a long metal pole with a bright yellow sign taped to the end.
It’s a roof rake, normally used to scrape snow off a house, but O’Rourke has different plans for this one. At the intersection, he stops at a Flock camera, an automated license plate reader that police use to track vehicles.
Normally, this camera records everyone who drives down this street. But not right now: O’Rourke lifts his rake into the air and blocks the camera with his sign. He waves at passing cars. Some drivers smile and wave back. A few people honk their horns.
“I don’t want to pay to be surveilled,” O’Rourke says. “My tax dollars are funding cameras at the end of my block. I don’t want to live like that. I don’t think anybody should have to live like that.”
O’Rourke, inspired by a man in Florida who used a pool skimmer to do the same thing, is part of a growing movement against automated license plate readers like Flock.
This week, Flock Safety, the Atlanta-based maker of the cameras, held its annual conference amid intense backlash.
According to the company, more than 5,000 law enforcement agencies use its technology. More broadly, there are more than 130,000 AI-powered automated license plate readers on American streets, according to DeFlock, an advocacy group that tracks the cameras.
A Flock license plate reader is seen along a public road last year in Houston.
David Goldman/AP
hide caption
toggle caption
David Goldman/AP
Every month, those cameras capture billions of license plates and other details about cars, including makes, models, colors and any alterations. That allows police to see where drivers have been over time.
“They monitor, quite simply, when we go to and from work, where we go to the doctor, where we drop our kid off at daycare. What we’ve enabled in practical reality is law enforcement to go back and look at where any of us was at any given point in time,” says Clare Garvie, deputy director of technology law and policy at New York University’s Policing Project.
Police leaders say Flock cameras help them locate stolen vehicles and missing people, and a recent preliminary study suggests that Flock cameras can deter car theft.
“There’s no question that license plate readers can be very helpful tools for law enforcement,” says Jeff Potts, executive director of the Minnesota Chiefs of Police Association.
But the expansion of the technology — combined with advancements in AI and the centralization of data in cloud networks — has increased the risk of abuse, says Jay Stanley, senior policy analyst with the Speech, Privacy and Technology Project at the ACLU.
And the technology has been misused: Some police officers, for instance, have used it to stalk ex-partners, or accessed the data for immigration enforcement purposes without a local government’s consent. A sheriff’s office in Texas used it to track a woman who may have had an abortion.
“The potential for police fishing expeditions is unlimited,” says Stanley. “What a lot of these AI, big data techniques do is they try to boil the ocean, to reduce huge amounts of data down to various people who they think could be involved. The problem with that, of course, is it sweeps up potentially enormous numbers of innocent people.”
And sometimes, the data is wrong: A 2024 analysis by a police department in California found Flock misread license plates in 71% of the alerts it sent to police.
The indiscriminate nature of the data collection, Garvie says, also raises concerns that the cameras violate the Fourth Amendment, which protects people from being searched unreasonably.
“We did not set up a system of governance in this country that says, ‘Just don’t do anything wrong and you won’t have anything to worry about.’ What we said is, ‘No, actually, law enforcement is affirmatively restricted against getting up in our business as we go about our daily lives,'” she says.
Garvie says she wants to see more oversight of the technology from lawmakers.
Last week, Flock changed some of its features to help prevent abuse, including shortening how long it recommends data be stored and cutting off access to officers who appear to be misusing the tool.
“We are so transparent about the business. We don’t own this data. We don’t sell this data. Cities have control over how long it’s stored. And who it’s shared with,” Garrett Langley, the CEO of Flock, told NPR.
An increasing number of people are combating the technology in both legal and illegal ways. According to an NPR review of local news reports, Flock cameras have been vandalized in at least 36 states.
People have stolen the cameras, sawed them down, crashed into them with cars, covered them in paint and stickers, and shot at them.
Someone vandalized this Flock camera near Washington Avenue and Westcott in Houston.
Raquel Natalicchio/Houston Chronicle via Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Raquel Natalicchio/Houston Chronicle via Getty Images
Social media is filled with tongue-in-cheek how-to videos, instructing viewers on things like how to discreetly saw through a metal pole.
The comments on Facebook posts from local news stations about the vandalism are rife with snark: “Not all heroes wear capes,” one commenter wrote.
“These are people being amped up to go do something. And I don’t think they’re being given the level of information they should that they’re also committing a felony,” Langley says.
Langley says if people have concerns with his company’s technology, they should take it up with their city council.
And many people have. According to DeFlock, at least 100 cities have deactivated the cameras or canceled contracts with Flock or similar companies.
Stanley, of the ACLU, says there’s a deep well of dislike in the U.S. for the notion of being surveilled by the government.
“We’re seeing opposition from the left. We’re seeing opposition from MAGA Republicans. We’re seeing opposition from mainstream Republicans, from centrists. And so it really is a nonpartisan issue,” he says. “This grassroots uprising is just really remarkable. At the end of the day, it’s not like anything I’ve seen in my 20-plus years as a privacy advocate.”
Organizers with DeFlock are holding a National Week of Action through Saturday. They say more than 25,000 people are registered for events around the country — things like protests and education sessions — that offer people a legal way to use their voice.
Resistance to police surveillance tech like Flock cameras grows : NPR npr.org/2026/08/21/nx-s1-593…
— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Aug 21, 2026
BREAKING: TURKEY ISSUES ARREST WARRANT FOR ISRAELI PM BENJAMIN NETANYAHU
— @ShaykhSulaiman Aug 21, 2026
#CIA #FBI #Mossad
x.com/mikenov/status/2090769…Michael Novakhov (@mikenov)GLOBAL #SECURITY AND #INTELLIGENCE #NEWS REVIEW
Ukraine Government Shakeup: Defense, Corruption share.gemini.google/jof9AvjK…
Here is an analytical breakdown of the recent structural shifts within Ukraine’s government, focusing on the dismissals of Mykhailo Fedorov and Iryna Mudra and their implications for the country’s security and political apparatus.The Ousting of Mykhailo Fedorov
Mykhailo Fedorov was dismissed from his position as Minister of Defense in mid-July 2026 after a six-month tenure, as reported by Defense News. Known as a digitally savvy modernizer, Fedorov was heavily credited with integrating innovative open-source and drone technologies into the military and pushing for structural budget reforms.
The Public Fallout: His sudden removal sparked significant street protests in Kyiv. Supporters and defense analysts argued that his departure could slow ongoing defense technology procurement and military modernization efforts, according to coverage by PBS News.
Call for Elections: On August 18, 2026, Fedorov released a video address directly challenging President Volodymyr Zelenskyy by breaking a wartime taboo and calling for presidential elections. According to The Guardian, Fedorov argued that democracy cannot be sidelined by the conflict and criticized government appointments based on personal loyalty over structural professionalism.
Defense Succession: Following Fedorov’s departure, lawmakers approved the appointment of Maj. Gen. Yevhenii Khmara—a former special operations expert and acting head of the state’s security service—as the new Minister of Defense.The Dismissal of Iryna Mudra
The political shakeup extended into the presidential administration with the dismissal of Iryna Mudra, the deputy head of the presidential office.
Anti-Corruption Probe: According to Euractiv, Mudra’s dismissal occurred as a major anti-graft investigation reached senior figures in the Ukrainian political establishment. Authorities reportedly searched several locations linked to her, though they have not formally named her as a suspect.
Broader Context: Her removal coincided with the broader cabinet reshuffle. GV Wire noted that anti-corruption authorities announced charges related to an alleged $3 million money-laundering scheme involving a deputy chief of Zelenskyy’s office just hours before the new defense minister was formally appointed.These dual developments represent a complex stress test for Ukraine’s wartime leadership apparatus, as the government attempts to balance strict anti-corruption oversight with the operational continuity of its defense technology and military structures.
–
AI Mode
x.com/mikenov/status/2090766…— https://x.com/mikenov/status/2090769222339059775— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Aug 21, 2026
⚡️BREAKING: Turkey has requested an INTERPOL Red Notice for Benjamin Netanyahu for Crimes Against Humanity
This comes following the Israeli Bombing of a Syrian Airbase with ties to the Turkish Military
— @IranObserver0 Aug 21, 2026
GLOBAL #SECURITY AND #INTELLIGENCE #NEWS REVIEW
Ukraine Government Shakeup: Defense, Corruption share.gemini.google/jof9AvjK…
Here is an analytical breakdown of the recent structural shifts within Ukraine’s government, focusing on the dismissals of Mykhailo Fedorov and Iryna Mudra and their implications for the country’s security and political apparatus.The Ousting of Mykhailo Fedorov
Mykhailo Fedorov was dismissed from his position as Minister of Defense in mid-July 2026 after a six-month tenure, as reported by Defense News. Known as a digitally savvy modernizer, Fedorov was heavily credited with integrating innovative open-source and drone technologies into the military and pushing for structural budget reforms.
The Public Fallout: His sudden removal sparked significant street protests in Kyiv. Supporters and defense analysts argued that his departure could slow ongoing defense technology procurement and military modernization efforts, according to coverage by PBS News.
Call for Elections: On August 18, 2026, Fedorov released a video address directly challenging President Volodymyr Zelenskyy by breaking a wartime taboo and calling for presidential elections. According to The Guardian, Fedorov argued that democracy cannot be sidelined by the conflict and criticized government appointments based on personal loyalty over structural professionalism.
Defense Succession: Following Fedorov’s departure, lawmakers approved the appointment of Maj. Gen. Yevhenii Khmara—a former special operations expert and acting head of the state’s security service—as the new Minister of Defense.The Dismissal of Iryna Mudra
The political shakeup extended into the presidential administration with the dismissal of Iryna Mudra, the deputy head of the presidential office.
Anti-Corruption Probe: According to Euractiv, Mudra’s dismissal occurred as a major anti-graft investigation reached senior figures in the Ukrainian political establishment. Authorities reportedly searched several locations linked to her, though they have not formally named her as a suspect.
Broader Context: Her removal coincided with the broader cabinet reshuffle. GV Wire noted that anti-corruption authorities announced charges related to an alleged $3 million money-laundering scheme involving a deputy chief of Zelenskyy’s office just hours before the new defense minister was formally appointed.These dual developments represent a complex stress test for Ukraine’s wartime leadership apparatus, as the government attempts to balance strict anti-corruption oversight with the operational continuity of its defense technology and military structures.
–
AI Mode
x.com/mikenov/status/2090766…Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) #Ukraine Political Shakeup: #Mudra, #Fedorov
News Today – 7:15 AM – AI Mode
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy dismissed Arena Mudra, the deputy head of the presidential office, amidst an ongoing corruption probe. Meanwhile, former defense minister Mykhailo Fedorov publicly challenged Zelenskyy by calling for national elections.
Today’s top news is dominated by escalating economic tensions between the United States and Iran, a fatal plane crash in Alaska, and major developments in U.S. defense and political legal battles. [1, 2, 3]
🌍 Global Conflicts & PoliticsU.S.–Iran Economic Strains: President Trump and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced plans for the “toughest sanctions in history” against Iran, threatening an “Economic D-Day” and severe economic consequences for any nation that continues to trade with Tehran. Fresh sanctions were also rolled out targeting Hezbollah. [3, 4, 5]
Ukraine Political Shakeup: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy dismissed Arena Mudra, the deputy head of the presidential office, amidst an ongoing corruption probe. Meanwhile, former defense minister Mykhailo Fedorov publicly challenged Zelenskyy by calling for national elections. [6]
Hong Kong Crackdown: A court convicted two former organizers of Hong Kong’s historical Tiananmen Square vigils under national security laws. [1, 7]🇺🇸 Domestic & Legal News
Alaska Plane Crash: A charter plane crashed near a remote military radar facility in western Alaska, resulting in the deaths of all eight individuals on board. [1, 2]
Aircraft Carrier Renaming Debate: The U.S. Navy has entered discussions regarding potentially renaming a future aircraft carrier after Donald Trump, shifting away from the previous plan to name it the USS Doris Miller after the heroic Black Pearl Harbor sailor. [8]
National Debt Surge: Concerns are mounting over the U.S. financial landscape as the national debt officially crossed the $40 trillion threshold, doubling over the span of the last decade. [9]
Texas High School Stabbing Case: The judge presiding over the high-profile trial of Karmelo Anthony—the teenager convicted of killing another teen at a track meet—was removed due to comments questioning his impartiality, bolstering defense efforts for a new trial. [1, 10]📉 Business & Finance
Market Reactions: Japan’s Nikkei index slid as escalating geopolitical friction in the Middle East drove global crude oil prices upward. [11]
Would you like to drill down into a specific area, such as global financial market details, updates on the Alaska aviation investigation, or the breakdown of the new U.S. sanctions?
[1] nbcnews.com[2] cnn.com
[3] reuters.com
[4] reuters.com
[5] nytimes.com
[6] youtube.com
[7] cnn.com
[8] nbcnews.com
[9] youtube.com
[10] youtube.com
[11] aljazeera.com
–Ukraine Political Shakeup: Mudra, Fedorov – AI Mode:
A major political shakeup is unfolding in Ukraine, marked by a sweeping anti-corruption raid that led to the firing of a top presidential aide and an unprecedented public challenge from a popular former defense minister. [1, 2]
The Dismissal of Iryna Mudra
On Wednesday, August 19, 2026, President Volodymyr Zelensky fired Iryna Mudra, the deputy chief of staff in the President’s Office who oversaw the judiciary. [3, 4]The Catalyst: Anti-corruption authorities (NABU and SAPO) raided Mudra’s property and office.
The Allegations: The raids are tied to an active, major investigation into money laundering and entrenched governance corruption. [1, 3]Mykhailo Fedorov’s Taboo-Breaking Defiance
Just hours before Mudra’s dismissal, Mykhailo Fedorov—the highly popular former defense minister and digital transformation architect who spearheaded Ukraine’s drone warfare program—shook the wartime administration by publicly calling for wartime presidential elections. [2, 5, 6, 7]Breaking the Taboo: Ukraine’s constitution and martial law explicitly prohibit elections during the Russian invasion. Fedorov completely shattered this long-standing political consensus by asserting that democracy cannot be treated as a “peetime luxury”. [2, 3, 6]
The Accusations: In a widely viewed video address, Fedorov heavily criticized a “systemic crisis of governance” and systemic procurement corruption besetting Kyiv. He demanded a “safe and realistic mechanism” to let frontline soldiers and refugees vote. [1, 2, 7]
Context of Ouster: Fedorov was forced out by Zelensky in mid-July 2026 after clashing with military top brass and attempting to clean up entrenched military procurement networks. His firing originally sparked massive street protests in Kyiv. [2, 8, 9, 10]Cabinet Response
To fill the vacuum and stabilize the defense establishment, the Ukrainian Parliament voted 312 to 2 on Wednesday to confirm Yevgeniy Khmara, a career intelligence official, as the new permanent Defense Minister. [4]
Would you like me to set up an information agent to track further developments in Ukraine’s unfolding political crisis, including updates on the anti-corruption probe and the intensifying debate over wartime elections?[1] youtube.com
[2] newsweek.com
[3] kyivindependent.com
[4] barrons.com
[5] youtube.com
[6] washingtonpost.com
[7] yahoo.com
[8] youtube.com
[9] theguardian.com
[10] youtube.com
–
youtube.com/watch?v=lze_-nTg…
-— https://x.com/mikenov/status/2090766497966670265— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Aug 21, 2026
#CIA #FBI #Mossad
x.com/mikenov/status/2090769…Michael Novakhov (@mikenov)GLOBAL #SECURITY AND #INTELLIGENCE #NEWS REVIEW
Ukraine Government Shakeup: Defense, Corruption share.gemini.google/jof9AvjK…
Here is an analytical breakdown of the recent structural shifts within Ukraine’s government, focusing on the dismissals of Mykhailo Fedorov and Iryna Mudra and their implications for the country’s security and political apparatus.The Ousting of Mykhailo Fedorov
Mykhailo Fedorov was dismissed from his position as Minister of Defense in mid-July 2026 after a six-month tenure, as reported by Defense News. Known as a digitally savvy modernizer, Fedorov was heavily credited with integrating innovative open-source and drone technologies into the military and pushing for structural budget reforms.
The Public Fallout: His sudden removal sparked significant street protests in Kyiv. Supporters and defense analysts argued that his departure could slow ongoing defense technology procurement and military modernization efforts, according to coverage by PBS News.
Call for Elections: On August 18, 2026, Fedorov released a video address directly challenging President Volodymyr Zelenskyy by breaking a wartime taboo and calling for presidential elections. According to The Guardian, Fedorov argued that democracy cannot be sidelined by the conflict and criticized government appointments based on personal loyalty over structural professionalism.
Defense Succession: Following Fedorov’s departure, lawmakers approved the appointment of Maj. Gen. Yevhenii Khmara—a former special operations expert and acting head of the state’s security service—as the new Minister of Defense.The Dismissal of Iryna Mudra
The political shakeup extended into the presidential administration with the dismissal of Iryna Mudra, the deputy head of the presidential office.
Anti-Corruption Probe: According to Euractiv, Mudra’s dismissal occurred as a major anti-graft investigation reached senior figures in the Ukrainian political establishment. Authorities reportedly searched several locations linked to her, though they have not formally named her as a suspect.
Broader Context: Her removal coincided with the broader cabinet reshuffle. GV Wire noted that anti-corruption authorities announced charges related to an alleged $3 million money-laundering scheme involving a deputy chief of Zelenskyy’s office just hours before the new defense minister was formally appointed.These dual developments represent a complex stress test for Ukraine’s wartime leadership apparatus, as the government attempts to balance strict anti-corruption oversight with the operational continuity of its defense technology and military structures.
–
AI Mode
x.com/mikenov/status/2090766…— https://x.com/mikenov/status/2090769222339059775— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Aug 21, 2026