Day: September 14, 2026
|
Michael_Novakhov shared this story from |
Ukraine’s people face a winter from hell. Thwarted on the battlefield, Russia is stepping up systematic, daily attacks on civilians, their homes, schools, hospitals, workplaces, and the vital infrastructure that sustains human life. Wave after wave of terrifying daytime ballistic missile and jet-drone strikes on Kyiv and other cities are destroying supermarket distribution hubs, pharmaceutical and medical facilities, logistics centres and warehouses. The result is sharply rising civilian casualties and growing shortages of food and other essentials. As a freezing winter approaches, Russia will again try to blow up Ukraine’s water supplies and power grid, cutting off electricity to millions. This is Vladimir Putin’s version of darkness at noon. He’d rather kill everybody than admit he’s lost.
Russia’s leader reportedly told Donald Trump this week that his “special military operation”, now in its fifth year, was going to plan. Trump may believe him. Western analysts certainly don’t. Failing militarily and taking huge casualties, his regime is under growing domestic economic and public pressure to wind down the war. Yet Putin seems to think one last big push can finally break Ukraine’s will. Trump’s renewed meddling – after months of inertia, he sent his patsy envoys, Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, back to Moscow last weekend (they also visited Kyiv for the first time) – perpetuates Kremlin delusions of victory. Now there’s talk of more talks. And all the while, Putin kills and kills. Each day is a crime against humanity.
This prospect of daily mass killings, rampant war crimes, malnutrition, homelessness and renewed, large-scale displacements of Ukrainian civilians – this intensifying Russian campaign of terror – is intolerable. So why don’t the western allies and Nato intervene to stop it?
The principal reason is chronic US ambivalence and unreliability, which has turned Ukraine into a seemingly irresolvable forever war. Former president Joe Biden tossed lifebelts to the Ukrainians in 2022, then left them to sink or swim. Trump has since tried to drown them. Despite halting the ground invasion and taking the fight to Russia’s heartlands, Ukraine is more vulnerable than ever to air attack. That’s largely because Trump has backtracked on allowing Ukraine to produce Patriot missile interceptors and paused weapons deliveries. Europe has so far failed to fill the gap. Trump’s fawning and feting of Putin, seen at last year’s nauseating Alaska summit, and his bullying of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, undermine Ukraine’s resistance, European security and hopes of an expedited settlement. Vulnerable civilians pay the price.
Many Ukrainians are weary of war. About 60% oppose ceding Donbas land to Russia but a similar number would support a ceasefire, backed by western security guarantees, that freezes current positions, a recent poll suggests. Most Russians also want it to stop. And like Moscow, Kyiv is feeling the financial pinch, notwithstanding a $100bn EU loan. There’s plainly a deal to be done. But Putin (like Trump over Iran) ignores public opinion. The indifference of authoritarian leaders to the popular will, let alone global opinion, is another reason forever wars proliferate. Whether the conflict is Ukraine, Gaza or Iran, ordinary people, watching from the margins, feel powerless to influence events. Familiarity deadens the senses over time. The horror of it all is scary and upsetting. It’s easier to look away.
Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump meet at the Elmendorf-Richardson military facility in Alaska, 15 August 2025. Photograph: Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP
Efforts to halt the US-Israel war on Iran, which began in February and has now extended to the Red Sea (Trump, remember, said it would only last a few weeks), and relentless post-2023 violence in occupied Palestine, are hampered, as in Ukraine, by the absence of credible, independent peace processes. This is another major factor fuelling the modern forever war phenomenon. Trump clumsily inserted himself into the Kyiv-Moscow argument, blatantly favouring one side. At no point did he trouble himself about the rights and wrongs of Putin’s war of choice. He aimed not to save lives but to win a Nobel peace prize (plus lucrative Russian energy deals).
Self-serving motives have similarly upset hopes of rescuing Gaza’s civilians from the Israeli military and Hamas. Trump’s “board of peace” and 20-point plan are primarily vehicles for his ego and greed, not a plausible route out of a political, military and humanitarian dead-end. As for ending the Iran debacle, the US president has lost interest. His refusal, like Putin, to accept the obvious, admit he failed to achieve his war aims, and seek a compromise with Tehran undercuts regional mediators and Gulf state allies, who rightly fear fighting will drag on indefinitely. Desperately needed: impartial, UN-empowered peace envoys to knock heads together.
Forever wars develop and grow entrenched in the absence of authoritative, universal legal frameworks respected and observed by all. The contempt shown by Trump, Putin and Israel’s leader, Benjamin Netanyahu, for basic principles of the post-1945 world order – rule of law, national sovereignty, oversight and enforcement by the international court of justice and international criminal court – directly contributes to the prolongation of conflict. Once the rules are cast aside, anything goes. That has ineluctably led to war crime atrocities such as those experienced in Gaza since the 7 October massacres; in Bucha, Mariupol and other towns and cities across Ukraine; and in Minab, southern Iran, where a US Tomahawk cruise missile allegedly killed more than 100 schoolgirls in February. Almost invariably, the culprits escape punishment. It’s impunity made law. It’s forever anarchy.
Another increasingly common feature of endless wars is the obstruction of full public scrutiny and accountability through independent media and UN investigations. Since the war with Hamas began, Israel’s army has tightly restricted international journalists’ access to Gaza. Despite the efforts of brave reporters, this policy has inevitably disguised and distorted the true picture of what happens there, not least for Israelis. Likewise, the US defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, releases only limited, selective information about Iran-related operations. This has led, for example, to under-reporting of the extent and cost of successful Iranian strikes on US bases in the Gulf. Russian state media routinely censor news from Ukraine. Most Russians have little idea how badly the war is going. Generally speaking, public ignorance facilitates abuses and prolongs conflict.
Forever wars are ultimately caused by failing, foolish leaders. For sure, generals foul up. In battle, things rarely go as expected. Clever strategies backfire. But the core problem is politicians who promise too much, underestimate their opponents, ignore less macho, peaceful alternatives, think they are above the law, will not admit mistakes – and, without shame or compunction, lie to your face. This is an age-old problem with no quick solution. But Ukraine’s people, facing a season from hell, urgently need additional assistance now.
Western democracies cannot sit on their hands as the civilian toll from Moscow’s barbarous onslaughts mounts daily. Nato must finally switch to the offensive, make clear more war crimes will not be tolerated, threaten to strike Russian drone and missile launch sites from the air (as previously, repeatedly, urged here) – and force Putin to back off before his forever war becomes everybody’s war.
-
Simon Tisdall is a Guardian foreign affairs commentator
-
Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
#CIA #DIA #Putin
Putin would rather keep killing than admit he’s lost. As a winter of misery looms in Ukraine, Nato must step in | Simon Tisdall | The Guardian theguardian.com/commentisfre…— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Sep 14, 2026
#PatternAnalysis in #Counterintelligence #Putin
9/11 and October 7 attacks: pattern analysis
An analysis of the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States and the October 7, 2023 attacks in Israel reveals deep structural patterns in how non-state actors achieve strategic surprise against highly advanced militaries. While the historical, political, and geographic contexts differ significantly, both events share striking parallels in intelligence failures, tactical execution, and geopolitical aftermath. [1, 2, 3, 4]
The direct comparisons below highlight the recurring patterns across both historic events.
Comparative Pattern Analysis
Dimension
The 9/11 Attacks (2001)The October 7 Attacks (2023)Perpetrator & Ideology Al-Qaeda: Global, decentralized Salafi-jihadist network. Hamas: Regional, nationalist Sunni-Islamist group governing an adjacent territory.
Tactical Execution
Asymmetric High-Tech Exploitation. Hijacked commercial airliners used as guided missiles.
Combined Arms Incursion. Simultaneous rocket barrages, drone strikes on automated defenses, and ground/sea/air breaches.
The Intelligence Blindspot
Failure of Imagination. US intelligence missed fragmented warnings because they did not conceive of terrorists using planes as weapons. The “Conceptzia” (Preconception). Israeli officials believed Hamas was rational, economically contained, and deterred from full-scale war. Immediate Impact~2,996 fatalities. Catastrophic economic shock and a profound shift in global security architecture.~1,200 fatalities and 251 hostages. Highest per-capita loss of life in Israel’s history, causing deep national trauma. State ResponseThe War on Terror: Invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, massive intelligence overhauls, and drone warfare.The Gaza Campaign: Complete military mobilization, full-scale ground invasion, and regional confrontation with the “Axis of Resistance”.
Core Structural Patterns
1. The Trap of “Status Quo” Thinking
In both cases, the primary failure was not a lack of raw data, but a rigid analytical framework that dismissed warning signs. [2, 3]
Before 2001, US intelligence tracked Al-Qaeda closely but assumed threats would manifest as traditional bombings or embassy attacks.
Before 2023, Israel possessed detailed blueprints of Hamas’s battle plans (such as the “Jericho Wall” document) but dismissed them as aspirational bravado, firmly believing Hamas was focused on governing Gaza rather than launching a catastrophic war. [4]
2. Technological Over-Reliance as a Vulnerability
Advanced states often develop blind spots by relying heavily on technical intelligence.
The US relied on sophisticated signals intelligence (SIGINT) but lacked sufficient human intelligence (HUMINT) deep inside Al-Qaeda’s core.
Israel constructed a multi-billion dollar smart border fence equipped with remote-controlled machine guns, cameras, and sensors. Hamas systematically exploited this by using low-tech commercial drones to drop explosives on cellular towers, blinding the automated system in the opening minutes of the assault.
3. Shaping Public Information Ecosystems
A modern parallel is the speed at which information and alternate narratives emerged. [5]
Following 9/11, it took years for an organized “9/11 Truth” movement to form alternative, conspiracy-driven accounts.
On October 7, the digital landscape allowed sophisticated denialism, real-time misinformation, and weaponized propaganda to spread on social media platforms while the attacks were still actively occurring. [5, 6]
4. The Geopolitical Echo Effect
The strategic trap laid by perpetrators in both patterns is to provoke a massive, conventional military reaction that forces the target state into protracted conflict. Just as Al-Qaeda aimed to draw the US into exhausting wars in the Islamic world, Hamas’s attack effectively disrupted burgeoning regional normalization efforts (such as the Abraham Accords) and refocused global attention entirely on the Palestinian issue, at a massive humanitarian and political cost to all sides.
[1] rand.org
[2] jewishjournal.com
[3] ctc.westpoint.edu
[4] tandfonline.com
[5] newsweek.com
[6] thesoufancenter.org– Google Search google.com/search?q=9%2F11+a…
— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Sep 14, 2026
9/11 and October 7 attacks: pattern analysis – Google Search google.com/search?q=9%2F11+a…
— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Sep 14, 2026
Former CIA director David Petraeus narrowly escaped a Russian drone strike near Ukraine’s border with Poland on September 13.
Petraeus was on a civilian train at Yahodyn station when passengers were evacuated after drones were heard overhead.
A jet-powered Russian drone then struck the locomotive of a nearby train, causing a large explosion.
Petraeus said the attack was “terrifying” and called it an act of a “truly barbaric leader” targeting Ukrainian civilians. He later continued safely into Poland.
Source: NYT
— @clashreport Sep 14, 2026
