September 2026 – Page 155

#CIA
#Kushner and #Witkoff’s approach reduces the tragedy of war to a balance sheet. As Luce correctly identifies, dangling cash in front of historical grievances is not an innovative breakthrough—it is, indeed, blind amateurism.
Critiquing Kushner’s Real Estate Diplomacy share.gemini.google/XDmOUuHn…
Kushner’s Real Estate Diplomacy – AI Mode – GS
x.com/mikenov/status/2097767…Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) #CIA #DIA #Mossad
The Russia-Ukraine conflict cannot be solved through transactional real estate-style dealmaking.
Handing the reins to Ratcliffe suggests the administration is looking for a more authoritative figure who commands respect from the security apparatuses of both nations.
CIA Director’s Role in Ukraine Talks share.gemini.google/Oo2EtHea…
US spy chief prepares for greater role in Russia-Ukraine talks ft.com/content/d0557d25-78b5…

Gemini
While the original Financial Times article is behind a paywall, the details of its exclusive report have been widely cited by other diplomatic and news sources.

Here is a summary of the Financial Times article and its surrounding context, followed by a brief commentary on the implications.

Summary of the FT Report

A Shift in Diplomatic Leadership: CIA Director John Ratcliffe is preparing to take a more prominent, leading role in U.S. “shuttle diplomacy” between Russia and Ukraine. His goal is to jump-start the stalled negotiations to end the four-and-a-half-year-long war.
Sidelining Political Envoys: The White House is actively considering scaling back the involvement of special envoy Steve Witkoff and President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner. Witkoff and Kushner have been leading the talks thus far—including eight trips to Moscow and one to Kyiv—but their efforts have failed to yield tangible diplomatic progress.
Leveraging Intelligence Channels: U.S. officials have informed their European counterparts of the shift. By stepping in, Ratcliffe plans to combine direct diplomatic negotiations with the backchannel contacts he already maintains with intelligence officers in both Moscow and Kyiv.
Pending Final Approval: While Ratcliffe is preparing for this expanded role, sources indicate that President Trump has not yet finalized the decision. Witkoff may still retain his broader title as a U.S. special envoy for peace missions (which includes Middle East negotiations) and might work in parallel with Ratcliffe.
Recent Precedent: The FT report follows Ratcliffe’s unannounced trip to Moscow in late August 2026—the first visit by a CIA chief to Russia since Bill Burns went in November 2021. During that trip, Ratcliffe reportedly warned Russian intelligence that escalating the war would backfire and urged a return to the negotiating table.

Commentary & Analysis

1. A Pivot to “Hard” Diplomacy

Replacing business-minded political appointees (Witkoff and Kushner) with a seasoned intelligence chief signals a realization in Washington that the Russia-Ukraine conflict cannot be solved through transactional real estate-style dealmaking. Ratcliffe’s involvement brings a hard-nosed, intelligence-driven approach to the table. As CIA Director, he has a clear-eyed view of battlefield realities, troop attrition, and economic vulnerabilities, allowing him to negotiate based on classified leverage rather than just political goodwill.
2. Frustration with the Kushner/Witkoff Channel

The reshuffling highlights a growing frustration with the current peace envoys. According to auxiliary reports, officials in Kyiv felt Witkoff was not applying enough pressure on Moscow, while the Kremlin partly blamed him for the lack of progress at recent summits. Handing the reins to Ratcliffe suggests the administration is looking for a more authoritative figure who commands respect from the security apparatuses of both nations.
3. Putin’s Resistance and the Uphill Battle

Despite the strategic shift, Ratcliffe faces an incredibly difficult task. Following his August visit to Moscow—where he reportedly warned the Kremlin that their position would only deteriorate in the coming months—Vladimir Putin responded not by softening, but by intensifying relentless airstrikes against Ukrainian civilian and energy infrastructure. This indicates that Putin likely viewed the U.S. push for talks as a sign of Western fatigue rather than Russian weakness.
4. The Backchannel Advantage

Historically, intelligence channels have remained the most resilient lines of communication between adversarial nations when traditional diplomatic relations break down. By centralizing the negotiations under the CIA Director, the U.S. ensures that peace talks are directly tied to the intelligence the U.S. is gathering on Russia’s military capabilities and its deepening military ties with Iran.— https://x.com/mikenov/status/2097767175624815104

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Sep 9, 2026

M	T	W	T	F	S	S
	1	2	3	4	5	6
7	8	9	10	11	12	13
14	15	16	17	18	19	20
21	22	23	24	25	26	27
28	29	30